Show tickets with no set milestone when sorting by priority
(this is an old issue from March).
This no longer works. "responsible:me state:open sort:priority" does not show issues without milestones. Removing the "sort:priority" shows these tickets...
(is there some reason you cannot request a ticket to be reopened and/or not be able to reference an old ticket?)
Discussions are closed to public comments.
If you need help with Lighthouse please
start a new discussion.
Keyboard shortcuts
Generic
| ? | Show this help |
|---|---|
| ESC | Blurs the current field |
Comment Form
| r | Focus the comment reply box |
|---|---|
| ^ + ↩ | Submit the comment |
You can use Command ⌘ instead of Control ^ on Mac
1 Posted by towski on 24 Apr, 2009 04:43 AM
Hey Adam, I just recently had this issue too.
If you do a "sort:milestone-priority" it should show all tickets, and sort them by priority (within their milestone).
If you do a "sort:ticket-priority" it should show them all as well, and sort them by their general priority.
I hope this works!
Thanks, Matt
2 Posted by Rick on 24 Apr, 2009 05:41 AM
Gah, he's right. This is a minor regression. We'll get the old behavior restored.
3 Posted by System on 24 Apr, 2009 05:41 AM
A Lighthouse ticket was created for this discussion
4 Posted by Rick on 24 Apr, 2009 05:52 AM
Okay, it's fixed and will be deployed soon.
Regarding your final question about old tickets, was your ticket opened on the old Lighthouse public project that we used? We've actually closed those down in favor of this support system. And, you are more than welcome to re-open old issues.
5 Posted by adam.luter on 24 Apr, 2009 11:57 AM
Hi Rick, Mike
Thanks for the quick reply.
sort:milestone-priority seems to do what I want in anycase, so I can
just avoid sort:priority (at the time of this writing it's still
regressed).
The older ticket I found on your tender system, before I submitted
this one. It was labeled closed, comments closed. I did not create
or participate in the original ticket.
It just seemed, from my point of view, that the most expedient way
would be able to request that conversation to be reopened, or to at
least be able to start a new conversation on that page (that would
then reference the old one).
-Adam
6 Posted by Rick on 24 Apr, 2009 05:24 PM
Ah. One of the problems with that is it notifies everyone else on the discussion. We removed the ability to reopen issues due to spam. Once we have a way to remove yourself from email updates, we'll likely resume the feature.
7 Posted by Rick on 28 Apr, 2009 02:49 AM
We just deployed the fix for the sort issue, along with a bunch of other things.
Rick closed this discussion on 28 Apr, 2009 02:49 AM.