tag:help.lighthouseapp.com,2008-09-20:/discussions/problems/68-searching-with-multiple-tagsLighthouse: Discussion 2011-04-07T05:34:27Ztag:help.lighthouseapp.com,2008-09-20:Comment/117792008-05-08T00:53:26Z2009-06-20T20:01:13ZSearching with multiple tags<div><p>I actually didn't know the current answer to this one, so I
tried for like 20 minutes and kept coming up short.</p>
<p>try searching for this</p>
<p>tagged:p1 tagged "friending"</p>
<p>I don't know as to the accuracy of the results, but it seems to
be working for it. It is possible, but its been in low demand and
is still a little awkward for some reason.</p></div>Will Duncantag:help.lighthouseapp.com,2008-09-20:Comment/117792008-05-08T00:56:37Z2009-06-20T20:01:13ZSearching with multiple tags<div><p>Huh. That was basically the first kind of search I thought of
doing. "Show me the high priority items for this component." I
guess I'm going to continue giving lighthouse a shot, but at the
moment I'm a little underwhelmed...</p></div>dwhsixtag:help.lighthouseapp.com,2008-09-20:Comment/117792008-05-08T01:02:35Z2009-06-20T20:01:13ZSearching with multiple tags<div><p>well search two tags in Lighthouse isn't an OR thing, so Rick
just told me.</p>
<p>When you search for the two tags, it has to have both present,
so only those with tag1 and tag2 will show up, but the query is odd
to me.</p>
<p>You asked the one search question I can't answer in confidence
off the top of my head, but I'll find out the answer to this for
you.</p>
<p>Overall, what makes you underwhelmed with the Lighthouse?</p></div>Will Duncantag:help.lighthouseapp.com,2008-09-20:Comment/117792008-05-08T03:40:54Z2009-06-20T20:01:14ZSearching with multiple tags<div><p>Multi tag searching appears to be working fine. I'll have to ask
Rick why your results may be inaccurate.</p>
<p>The correct query is indeed:</p>
<p>tagged:p1 tagged:friending</p></div>Will Duncantag:help.lighthouseapp.com,2008-09-20:Comment/117792008-06-11T20:57:40Z2009-06-20T20:01:19ZSearching with multiple tags<div><p>Along these same lines, I think it would be useful to bring (at
least a little) regex checking into the search. For instance, I
assign tickets as new and a dev, fed, designer, etc. marks it as
open once they begin to work on it. For several reasons, it's
useful to have both states. Given this, I would like to do a search
to the effect of "tagged:something state:[new|open]" I think
introducing BASIC regex checking could be extremely helpful without
bogging down less technical people with complicated details. This
would also allow people to explicitly define whether or not they
want an and or an or search, etc.</p></div>Jason LeMoine